Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05554
Original file (BC 2012 05554.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05554
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His 18 Jun 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) failure be corrected in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The failure is unjust because he was suffering from a hernia which affected his performance.  At the time of the FA, he was unaware of his medical condition.  

In support of the request, the applicant provides medical information.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is serving on active duty in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).

The applicant’s most recent FA results are as follows:

Date 
Composite Score
Rating
3 Jul 2013
94.00
Excellent  
(Exempt Cardio)
3 Dec 2012
85.00
Satisfactory (Exempt Cardio, push-ups,    sit-ups
4 Sep 2012
72.00
Unsatisfactory (Exempt Cardio, push-ups, 
sit-ups)
18 Jun 2012
70.20
Unsatisfactory 
22 Dec 2011
79.30
Satisfactory
28 Jun 2011
76.30
Satisfactory
14 Dec 2010
79.30
Satisfactory

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is included at Exhibit B.  

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removing the FA, dated 18 Jun 2012; however, recommends exempting the applicant from the cardio component.  Based on the evidence provided by the applicant, DPSIM can conclusively determine the applicant had a medical condition that affected his ability to successfully complete the FA.  Unfortunately, the Primary Care Manager (PCM) did not provide details on the applicant’s limitations during the FA; a review of his fitness history indicates he performed satisfactorily in all components with the exception of the cardio component.  Considering the cardio component requires running, we can correlate the applicant’s injury with the limited running capability, thus a poor score in that component.  

Air Force Instruction 36-2905, Fitness Program, Air Force Guidance Memorandum 3, states that if the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the unit commander may invalidate the test results.  There is no evidence that indicates the commander invalidated the assessment; in fact the evidence does not indicate any commander intervention.  The absence of this evidence does not overshadow the fact the applicant’s medical condition affected his FA.  The documentation provided by the applicant substantiates his claim of a preexisting medical condition and the fitness report indicates only the cardio component was affected.  If the Board approves exemption of the cardio component, the applicant would receive a composite FA score of 86, Satisfactory.     

The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Sep 2013 (Exhibit C) for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office has not received a response.  

________________________________________________________________



THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of the facts and circumstances of this case, we are persuaded the applicant has suffered an injustice. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice.  Accordingly, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected to the extent set forth below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio component of his Fitness Assessment, dated 18 Jun 2012, be amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System.  

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 17 Dec 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      , Panel Chair
      , Member
	, Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2012-05554 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 Jan 2013, with atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 25 Jul 2013, w/atch.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Sep 2013.




				
								Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00455

    Original file (BC-2013-00455.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The failed FA is an injustice as she is currently pending medical care for a chronic hip condition. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded stating that she has a chronic health condition that affected her ability to pass the FA. Her squadron commander issued her a Letter of Counseling (LOC) but then dropped it as a result of her medical condition.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02001

    Original file (BC 2013 02001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02001 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 14 Sep 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In the letter he expresses his opinion, explaining how his medical condition and pride of admitting his physical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04441

    Original file (BC 2013 04441.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), stating “there was not enough or specific details of the medical condition provided from the applicant’s medical provider.” A list of the applicant’s last 10 FAs is as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-Ups Rating 5 Feb 14 82.00 Exempt Satisfactory 19 Jun 13 79.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Feb 13 85.00 Exempt Satisfactory *27 Dec 12 23.50 39/0.00 Unsatisfactory 25 Jun...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00617

    Original file (BC-2013-00617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00617 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 17 Jan 2013 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends denial stating there is no evidence that his unit commander...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00290

    Original file (BC-2013-00290.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report; AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, and a letter of support from his medical provider. He also received an AF Form 422, dated 2 Jan 2013, exempting him from the cardio portion of the FA; and on 15 Jan 2013, his medical provider submitted a memorandum for record stating he was injured during the 20 Dec 2012 FA. The medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05443

    Original file (BC 2013 05443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05443 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 17 Dec 12, 15 Mar 13, and 12 Jun 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In support of his appeal the applicant submits; a “Medical Determination” letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05596

    Original file (BC 2012 05596.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05596 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessments (FA), dated 11 Jun 12 and 6 Sep 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). While we note the applicant’s stated request to have the entire FA removed, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605

    Original file (BC 2013 04605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04468

    Original file (BC 2013 04468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Finally, the applicant did not provide any additional supporting documentation to consider, i.e., commander’s invalidation, AF Form 422, etc.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to void and remove the FAs dated 22 Feb 11, 1 Mar 11, and 22 Jun 11. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM and AFPC/DPSIDE evaluations is at Exhibit B and Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00053

    Original file (BC-2013-00053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for removal of the contested FAs. The applicant has failed to provide any information from the rating officials on the contested report. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00053 in Executive Session on 30 Jan 2014, under the provisions of AFI...